Review show based on looking at the most current and popular FIlms. The but comparing them to other similar Films, comparing the actors to what they've been in before and going of previous work of the actors what to expect from them, will it be good? is it over rated? the problem with this is its biased opinions. but i think it would be interesting to have a debate between two people with different opinions. a segment of the show could be a minute rant/argument between a fan of a show and someone who dislikes the show. Viewers would enjoy this, everyone loves watching an argument.
An Example of an Argument is When Kate Hopkins Went onto this morning and had a rant about "baby names" she was saying she judges her childr's friends based off their names. However another woman was arguing back that you cant judge your children's friends, especially because of their names that they didn't even choose themselves.
My target audience would be people aged 12+ mainly because im not doing films rated PG or under, its 12 rated films and over. This is so it can be a fairly serious show and i dont think the attention of kids could be kept through my show, so i think my audience has to be fairly old, at least teenagers.
Constraints could be there may not be good enough films out, but on the other hand if i do films released in the last 6 month there will at least be 5 good films out, other constraints is i need non biased people to do my review, i cant have someone doing a review on the wolf of wall street when they think they're Leonardo DiCaprios' biggest fan. i need neutral opinions off non biased candidates.
Guests consist off 3 people, one to present the show, 2 two debate and then the presenter can add opinions also. i think this will add a good balance and give enough opinions and relevant information out.
My VT will be clips from each movie, possibly just the trailer from each film and a break down of each film, 1:50-2:50 minutes of discussion for each film this will make it fluent and not too long winded.
An Example of an Argument is When Kate Hopkins Went onto this morning and had a rant about "baby names" she was saying she judges her childr's friends based off their names. However another woman was arguing back that you cant judge your children's friends, especially because of their names that they didn't even choose themselves.
My target audience would be people aged 12+ mainly because im not doing films rated PG or under, its 12 rated films and over. This is so it can be a fairly serious show and i dont think the attention of kids could be kept through my show, so i think my audience has to be fairly old, at least teenagers.
Constraints could be there may not be good enough films out, but on the other hand if i do films released in the last 6 month there will at least be 5 good films out, other constraints is i need non biased people to do my review, i cant have someone doing a review on the wolf of wall street when they think they're Leonardo DiCaprios' biggest fan. i need neutral opinions off non biased candidates.
Guests consist off 3 people, one to present the show, 2 two debate and then the presenter can add opinions also. i think this will add a good balance and give enough opinions and relevant information out.
My VT will be clips from each movie, possibly just the trailer from each film and a break down of each film, 1:50-2:50 minutes of discussion for each film this will make it fluent and not too long winded.
No comments:
Post a Comment